On Death by Parallel Parking
Written on: April 01, 2022
On Death by Parallel Parking - Hi friends, I hope you are all in good healthZoneupdate, In the article you are reading this time with the title On Death by Parallel Parking , We have prepared this article well for you to read and take information in it. hopefully the contents of the post
Artikel Beatriz Calvo Pena,
Artikel canada,
Artikel Parallel Parking,
Artikel South Beach,
Artikel Sudden Unintended Acceleration, what we write you can understand. ok, happy reading.
Title : On Death by Parallel Parking
link : On Death by Parallel Parking
You are now reading the article On Death by Parallel Parking with link address https://zone-update.blogspot.com/2022/04/on-death-by-parallel-parking.html
Title : On Death by Parallel Parking
On Death by Parallel Parking
On Death by Parallel Parking
![]() |
by David Arthur Walters
ARGUMENT
The reason mass media give names to people is to publicly identify them. The reason for revealing their age is to reveal their identity more accurately because many people may have the same name. If the report is negative, it is possible to file a libel suit against the media. Addresses were provided to further verify identities, but this practice was stopped as it has serious consequences for the persons identified. Identifying an individual as a suspected criminal in a negative context is public defamation to protect the public. The aim is to discredit women and the elderly for an indefinite period when using descriptive terms such as an elderly driver in a car accident in which no name or age is specified. Ethical editors should not use their own words or gender age. They should not refer to an individual as a driver when describing an individual as being responsible for a car accident. Under no circumstances should older women use the prescription for aging and sex as a guide. However, this unprofessional practice is common in many police departments and press outlets.
PARELLELOPHOBIA
A 2020 survey taken by Taylor Covington for The Zebra, the nation’s top insurance comparison researcher, revealed that nearly half of Americans have “Parallelophobia,” the fear of parallel parking. Their biggest fear is not Hitting Another Car (21%), which would cost them an average of $2,061 in additional premiums, but is Holding Up Traffic (24%). Getting Blocked In (12%), People Watching (11%) and Hitting A Curb (7%) completes the top five fears. The results reported did not include Killing Someone, which happened in South Beach, Florida, in February 2022, a parallel parking accident that soon became an internationally broadcasted event, thanks to organized media.
Florida, dropped parallel parking from its driving exam in 1990, the first of 14 states to do so.
MIAMI BEACH POLICE PRESS RELEASE
The Miami Beach Police Department and Miami Beach Government fed Media the following report drafted by an anonymous official:
“This evening at 6:03 p.m., Miami Beach Police and Fire responded to a traffic crash at 22 Washington Avenue. Preliminary information indicates an elderly woman was attempting to parallel park, but accelerated on the outdoor café of the restaurant. The woman struck several tables resulting in 7 patients being transported to the hospital. Unfortunately, one of the patients transported died at the hospital.”
SUDDEN UNINTENDED ACCELERATION
The driver would be shamed and exposed to public ridicule as is customary despite journalism ethics professed by the industry. TV and print media had a field day with the report and other scant information gathered from the police and witnesses and other sources. The driver was a “woman” driver and an “elderly” one at that, but she was also driving a Bentley, and the person killed was a well-known, beloved member of the community. A media outlet, knowing well that the woman had tested negative for alcohol, reported that the driver was charged with DUI several years ago.
What we have here is yet another, rather common Sudden Unintended Acceleration event. A driver pushed the wrong pedal and then tried to correct it by making it harder. He is then subjected to prejudicial police reports and social media, so he deserves to be shamed to death if not lynched by social media vigilantes wearing special Facebook badges.
THE HYSTERIA
Hysteria was naturally whipped up to the effect that a rich, drunken and demented old woman, who was seen by someone driving erratically elsewhere and who should have been in bed instead of behind the wheel, had chosen to "murder" a man and hurt others with her “Rolls Royce” in South Beach, described as a "sewer" where one should not live because "all bad things happen there." She was a “heartless” woman (obviously without acting skills) showing "no remorse" at the scene because she was probably on haze prescribed by her doctor for chronic stress, for which she was roundly ridiculed; the press was taken to task for even mentioning it. By the way, it was correctly noted that Miami has the worst drivers. It was pointed out that the homicide victim was not black and was a resident, therefore revenge must be had. Her license should be revoked; old people should be tested before getting renewals; the government ought to provide Uber services to the elderly. After all, “elderly” people should not be allowed to drive. “We” in Europe revoke licenses at age 65, one poster stated, which was denied by persons familiar with France and Spain.
Welcome to the Miami Beach jury. There were, however, holdouts. For example, Beatriz Calvo Pena was sympathetic to the driver and the victims:
“Dios Mio! Que muerte tan sinsentido. Pobre tambien de la senora que causo el accidente. Debio de equivocar con el acelerator. Oremos por las almas de ambos.” (My God! What a meaningless death. Also for the poor lady who caused the accident. She must have made a mistake with the accelerator. Let us pray for the souls of both.)
Bad urban planning, someone said, makes sitting on sidewalks next to traffic very dangerous. I posted a link to my report on a perilous seating arrangement at a Washington Avenue intersection where a driver lost control and crashed into a drug store. The seating was contrary to the city safety code, but officials said they could do nothing about it because the restaurant was owned by a prominent person and the seating was approved despite the defect. I also pointed out a bad accident in Miami where a car ran through a sidewalk café.
And I pointed out that on 11 March this year, a car killed two women and injured six others, three with life-threatening injuries, sitting at a sidewalk café in Washington, D.C. No age was given for the driver described as an “elderly man” in a major media report.
As for the alleged “heartlessness” and “complete absence of remorse” of our Florida driver behind the wheel of a Bentley, a Facebook commentator said the woman was probably in shock; that led to another comment about her alleged drug use.
The police department later reported there was no evidence of alcohol, and she was not charged. However, the matter was under investigation, so police incompetence or corruption was implied by some commentators as usual.
MEDIA ETHICS
The media outlets reporting on the accident were on the whole disrespectful of the driver, failed to show compassion for her, pandered to lurid curiosity, and failed to take responsibility for same. That is normal. When taken to task for same, an ombudsman usually steps up to prevaricate like a defense lawyer.
THE “ELDERLY” STEREOTYPE
I objected to the use of the word “elderly.” I remarked that there should never be used to describe an individual, especially in this situation. The police department knew the age of the driver. The police department reporter must have known that the term “elderly” implies disability and incompetence of very old people and plays up to the ageism prejudice of young residents and journalists. Yet trying to explain to police officers that there is no such thing as “elderly” is like trying to convince people there is no such thing as race. The police department did not respond to a request for comment on the subject.
Worldwide ethical guidelines recommend against using stereotypical terms such as “elderly.”
Journalists and police department public relations officers who care about the psychological impact of their statements might want to consult the Style Manual of the American Psychological Association: to with, the use of “elderly” should be avoided because it stereotypes and stigmatizes groups of people.
And it would such behoove them to peruse, for example, the October/December issue of the Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy:
“The terms senile, demented, and aged are unfortunate terms once in common use among physical therapy personnel. While these terms have mostly disappeared, there is still a term in common use that needs to disappear, the term elderly…. A specific descriptor such as elderly is inaccurate and misleading. For example, asked to describe an 82-year-old woman would provoke little agreement and much discussion based on personal experiences. Eighty-two-year-old women run marathons, and 82-year-old women are bedridden…. The term elderly is ageist. Ageist terms are those terms in which a stereotype is promulgated and treatment is delivered differently on the basis of age. AgLikeacism and sexism, ageism is a form of prejudice or prejudgment that shapes perceptions. Ageist terms tend to diminish older adults, yet ageism is rampant in health care, stereotyping older folks as sick, frail, and physically dependent. Ageism can result in less care, less robust care, and negatively affect outcomes.”
Across the pond, 'Guidance for reporting on aging and older age,' produced by the Center for Aging Better and the Older People’s Commissioner for Wales, included in the Independent Press Standards Organization's (IPSO) external resources for journalists, urges journalists and editors to move away from stereotypes and embrace more realistic depictions of later life, to use terminology that older people prefer – such as ‘older’ rather than ‘elderly,’ and to avoid ‘compassionate ageism,’ where older people are patronized and framed as vulnerable or needy.
Consider pertinent excerpts from The International Longevity Center's 2009 USA Styleguide for Journalism, Entertainment and Advertising Media article ‘Takes on Aging.’ It appears that calling people “elderly” can kill them.
'Becca Levy, an associate professor of epidemiology and psychology at Yale University, who studies the health effects of such messages on elderly people, found that little insults can lead to more negative images of aging and, in fact, even worsen functional health over time. Levy’s seminal long-term survey of 660 people over age 50 in a small Ohio town, published in 2002, found that those who had positive perceptions of aging lived an average of 7.5 years longer – a bigger increase than that associated with exercising or not smoking.'
'Writers, particularly those who consider themselves nowhere near being a “senior” or among “the elderly,” must remember that the bar has moved to the right, says Jim Berkman, editor of McKnight’s LongTerm Care News. “What once might have been considered old (perhaps 60 or 65) no longer is. The average age of nursing home residents, for example, is closer to 80 than most people would think; for assisted living, it is over 80.” If you need to identify individuals over the age of 50, “older adults” is preferred over “senior” and “elderly,” which can be discriminatory in nature. After all, we don’t refer to people under age 50 as “junior citizens.” Instead, say “man” and “woman,” and give the age, if relevant to the story. Elderly: Use this word carefully and sparingly. The term is appropriate only in generic phrases that do not refer to specific individuals: concern for the elderly, a home for the elderly, etc. In other words, describing a person as elderly is bad form, although the generalized category ‘elderly” might not be offensive. If the intent is to show that an individual’s faculties have deteriorated, the Associated Press Stylebook recommends citing a graphic example and attributing it to someone.'
WOMAN DRIVERS!
IdIdentifyinghe the driver in the tragic Miami Beach incident as a woman has stereotypical implications aSo-called Women Drivers are said to be timid and careful, holding up traffic like Sunday Drivers of yore, especially when parallel parking, a function mechanically minded men naturally have little problem with. Videos on YouTube of women attempting to parallel park have gotten hundreds of thousands of guffaws from males, naturally adept at geometry. Indeed, automatic parallel parking programs in modern cars was invented to accommodate females. Problem is, they are afraid to use them.
A friend of mine, whose father was an engineer, taught her how to parallel park, and she does a fine job of it, parking as good as any man, yet she is afraid of holding up traffic, and she even jokes that she is a Woman Driver so men will be more considerate. She refuses to use the automatic parking program on her car although she turns all the other programs ones on, including the automatic emergency braking that would presumably have prevented the accidental sudden acceleration of the Bentley if only it were a late model, which it reportedly is not.
HOMICIDAL ACCIDENT DRIVERS
By the way, a driver, regardless of gender, maybe indicted for negligent homicide if they buy the wrong kind of floor mat to replace the one coming with their car, as we can see in a Forensic Science International Report available online on 11 March 2020 entitled 'Analysis of unintended acceleration through physical interference of accelerator.' In most sudden unintended acceleration situations, drivers panic and keep pressing the acceleration pedal instead of taking their feet off the accelerator. Researchers have found pedal angular velocity a critical factor in pedal misoperation, and that knowledge can be useful in designing SUA prevention systems.
In this forensic report the driver was identified as a woman, perhaps because women are smaller than men, which can be a factor in seat position and reaching the pedals. Her age was 34, so the reader may infer that she was physically and mentally abler than, say, a 90-year-old woman. The investigator reported that she “skillfully” maneuvered her 2011 Spark along a street through seven intersections with stoplights after it suddenly accelerated one evening, reaching speeds as high as 71 mph, traveling 1.8 miles, killing a bicycler before crashing into a building. The block box recorded the whole event including her screams. She pushed on the brake pedal in vain. However, if he had definitively and continually depressed it, the accident would not have happened. The problem was that the suspended accelerator pedal had gotten entrapped on one end of the thick floor mat with a honeycomb surface she had purchased and misplaced on the car's floor. She could not imagine what was going on and was “naturally bewildered.”
“It was a regrettable accident. The above results were provided to the prosecution and were accepted as the cause of the accident. The driver was indicted for negligent homicide.... Every driver should be aware that pedal entrapment is something that can happen to anyone, and hence everyone should pay attention to relevant components inside the car.”
Well, that should teach everyone a lesson, to never make a mistake. No doubt a young man would make sure the mat fit properly. But wait a minute, we are left wondering if he would do that without having the same accident, because she had been driving the car around for some time before her pedal became entrapped. The report does not indicate whether she was convicted or not.
So that accident resulting in a criminal charge for negligence seems to cast some doubt on my argument that identifying descriptors should not be used for accidents, but it really does not, for there is insufficient reason for media to warn the public to watch out for this woman because she misplaced a mat on the floor of her car.
COMPARE CANADA
Finally, to further illuminate reporting ethics, contrast these reports from Canada on the same event:
‘Canadian Honda Driver Tries To Parallel Park, Ends Up Crashing And Rolling Over’
by Brad Anderson, CARSCOOPS, 12 October 2019
Four people were injured in a crash in downtown Vancouver earlier this week after the driver of a Honda reversed across the sidewalk and rolled the sedan onto its roof. Footage of the incident shows the driver of the black Honda attempting to parallel park. However, it seems as though the driver mistook the accelerator for the brake pedal and the car quickly accelerated back, jumping over the curb, slamming into a concrete plant bed, and rolling onto its roof. If you watch the footage closely, you will see at least three people standing near the plant bed as the Honda rolls over. Two of them can be seen narrowly avoiding getting crushed by the car. Vancouver Police Department Sgt. Aaron Roed told the Daily Hive that four people were injured in the crash and that all were transported to local hospitals for treatment. Two of the people injured were occupants in the vehicle, while the other two were pedestrians. He said the condition of those wounded remains unknown. Authorities closed Hornby Street where the crash occurred as they investigated the incident. As unfortunate as it is that four people were injured, things could have been worse. JuTwoyclists can ride directly past where the Honda reversed over the curb and careened across the sidewalk. Just seconds before the incident, these cyclists had been just a little slower. They could have been struck and badly injured.
CDV News Reports: A driver overturned in downtown Vancouver on Tuesday, injuring several pedestrians. Dashcam footage shows a black Honda Accord parked on Hornby Road trying to park parallel. The car overtook the immigration and overturned, and stopped on the sidewalk. The sergeant said two pedestrians were injured in the crash and rushed to the hospital. Aaron Road with Vancouver Police. The elderly woman driving the vehicle and her passengers were rushed to hospital with fatal injuries despite being seriously injured. It seemed like a strange accident, Rhodes said. The building mirrors at the immigration office were damaged, but no one inside was injured. According to British Columbia Health Service paramedics, most pedestrians were treated at the scene. BC EHS received a 911 call at 9:23 a.m. and sent several ambulances. Caroline Nutson stood outside her work and saw the danger. She ran to help the abused pedestrian. A woman had some bruises on her face. One woman said she looked vulgar. So I hope everyone is safe. Hornby Road was closed to drivers and cyclists between Davy Street and Helmken Street during a police investigation. We (the injured) want to recover quickly, and congratulations to them, Rhodes said.
That's the article On Death by Parallel Parking
That's it for the article On Death by Parallel Parking this time, hopefully can be useful for all of you. okay, see you in another article post.
You are now reading the article On Death by Parallel Parking with link address https://zone-update.blogspot.com/2022/04/on-death-by-parallel-parking.html